|
Post by Josh on Jun 7, 2006 18:35:01 GMT -5
Okay. Finally, I get a chance to pour out a theory. I've talked about this with Julian, Marion, Monica, DJ, and Soraya, and they all (to varying degrees) agree with it.
Sage and Gurinder, especially Sage, have been pushing to vote out the inactives. Which doesn't actually make sense. Spies probably won't be inactives - so why would we as citizens want to vote them out?
Because, you might be thinking, Sage and Gurinder are spies. It benefits them to vote out inactives, because the spies (in this hypothetical situation, Sage and Gurinder) are safe from the vote. And if the spies are going after the citizens, and the citizens are going after the inactives, who's going after the spies? Nobody. The inactives sure aren't going to do it.
Of course, the logical rebuttal would be that we want inactives gone so there are as many votes as possible. But if we remove one spy's vote, that's much more helpful than removing one inactive's vote.
I don't know either way for sure. All I know is I'm waiting to see if Sage is out, and whether or not he's a spy.
|
|
|
Post by Judge Sam on Jun 8, 2006 21:43:43 GMT -5
Interesting thoughts. I love hearing your thoughts and reading your conversations. You are really an active part of this game and it shows. I can't really ask for a better player to host - players like you make the game as great as it is. I like reading the conversations as well. One question: Would you mind posting all of the conversations from one episode into one thread? Like maybe do a "Episode Two Conversations" and then just post them all in there. That way after the game is over people will be able to read them and put a timestamp with them in relation to other conversations. But if you really like the other way, that's fine of course it's up to you. I'm just glad that you are posting them (I know it's a hassle to copy/paste all the time). Can't wait to see what's going to happen in the future for ya!
|
|